SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(All) 39

S.C.MATHUR, V.KUMAR
MAHARSHI AVADHESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


S. C. MATHUR, J.

( 1 ) - The petitioner Maharshi Avadhesh also known as A. B. Shorewala, who has described himself as Founder-President of Rashtrirya Party, has filed this petition seeking issuance of certain directions to the Prime Minister of India, the Union Home Minister, the Union of India and "others concerned" in respect of the matters specified in the prayer clause. At the time of hearing the petitioner, who argued the case in person, elaborated the term "others concerned" by submitting that notices of the petition may be issued also to Honble the Chief Justice of India and to a sitting Judge of this Court who till recently was a Judge of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir. The directions, sought by the petitioner run into 19 clauses. In these clauses the petitioner seeks directions to hold inquiry or investigation into certain matters, directions to some holding high public offices to resign from the said offices, and directions to the concerned authorities to dismiss certain public servants and constitutional authorities from the posts or offices they are presently holding. The prayer extends even to directions to amend the Constitution and take back the lost territory o
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top