G.D.DUBEY
RAJ BAHADUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an application for bail.
( 2 ) ON a search of the applicant 5 gm. of brown sugar was recovered. The applicant has been arrested in connection with an offence punishable under Sections 17/18, N. D. P. S. Act (hereinafter referred to as Act ).
( 3 ) IT has been argued that the search was not in accordance with Section 51 of the Act. It was also urged that public witnesses were not summoned to witness the search and recovery. Lastly, it was urged that Section 37 of the Act is not applicable to the High Court. Therefore, the High Court can look into the matter from its own angle.
( 4 ) I have heard the learned A. G. A. also. He has raised the preliminary objection that the Union of India should be also made a party to this case because the Union of India has a cell to control the menace of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic substances.
( 5 ) IN reply to the above objection the learned counsel for the applicant has urged that the sole purpose of making the State Government or Union of India as a party to the petition is only to give an opportunity to the State Government or Union of India to oppose the application if they so like. In this case the investigation
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.