SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(All) 267

A.P.MISRA
IQBAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
JAGDISH CHANDRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.N.BHARGAWA

A. P. MISHRA, J.

( 1 ) THE present revision is being disposed of finally at the admission stage after serving the opposite parties. Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been filed.

( 2 ) HEARD learned counsel for the parties. The present revision is directed as against an order dated 19-2-1988 by which the trial Court has rejected the application of amendment in the plaint filed by the plaintiff-applicants. The plaintiffs-applicants moved an application before the trial Court for amendment in the plaint by virtue of which in the relief clause instead of defendants 2 to 6, defendants 1 to 6 were sought to be added. It was averred that it has occurred by typing error and instead of defendants 1 to 6, it has been typed as defendants 2 to 6. There is no other amendment sought. However, the court below rejected the application. Feeling aggrieved, the present revision has been filed.

( 3 ) LEARNED counsel for the applicants urged that since the amendment seeking all the partners to give account is necessary, the amendment should be allowed. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the opposite parties has vehemently urged that from the amendment sought, the cause of action will change.












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top