R.M.SAHAI, B.L.YADAV
RAM PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
( 1 ) WHETHER the Special Land Acquisition Officer/collector, Allahabad has exercised his power for acquisition of land and for issuance of notification dated 9-12-87, published in the newspaper dated 20-12-87 (Annexure-2 to the petition ). Under Section 4 (1) read with Section 17 (4) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, (for short the Act), dispensing with the provisions of Section 5a of the Act in good faith and if not, whether such notification was a colourable exercise of power or fraud on executive power and exercise of such power was vitiated, and whether the right of summary hearing under Section 5a of the Act could be dispensed with under the circumstances of the case, are the short questions of law for our consideration in this petition filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a relief for a writ of certiorari for quashing the notification dated 9-12-87/20-12-87 (Annexure-2) issued under Section 4 read with Section 17 (4) the Act.
( 2 ) THE counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged and learned counsel for the parties agreed that the writ petition may be decided on merits. We accordingly proceed to decide it on
Collector (District Magistrate), Allahabad v. Raja Ram Jaiswal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.