SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(All) 235

N.N.MITHAL
MOHAMMAD KHALID – Appellant
Versus
ZEENAT PARVEEN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
RAVI KANT CHADHA

N. N. MITHAL, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant was married to one Yasmin in 1980 but the marriage did not bear fruit as no child was born to them until 1984. On 13th Jan. 1984 the appellant married a second time whereafter he and his wife Zeenat Parveen lived together for some time. On 10-11-1984 a son was born. According to Zeenat Parveen she was the mother and had given birth to the son while the appellant claimed that Yasmin, his first wife, was the mother of the child. On an application being moved under Sec. 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act the court below has answered this question of motherhood in favour of Zeenat Parveen to whom the custody of the minor has also been entrusted. Aggrieved by the order, the husband filed the present appeal.

( 2 ) TWO main questions arise for consideration. The first question is whether the child was born out of the womb of first or the second wife of appellant. The second question is as to where the welfare of the minor lies in the facts and circumstances of the present case.

( 3 ) IT is undisputed that from 1980 to 1984 the first wife had remained barren. According to the allegations made in the application under S. 25, the desire to have a child was
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top