SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(All) 466

B.L.YADAV
CHHATRAPAL – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR, FATEHPUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K.MISHRA

B. L. YADAV, J.

( 1 ) WHETHER the appeal under Section 18 of the Arms Act, 1959, (for short the Act) read with arms Rules, 1962, (for short the Rules), can be filed within thirty days from the date of order or from the date of service of the order on the person against whom the impugned order revoking the licence has been passed, and what is the meaning to be assigned to the expression within thirty days from the date of issue of the order, are the short questions that fall for determination in the present petition filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner has prayed for a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 13-10-86 passed by the district Magistrate dismissing the appeal as time barred and the order dated 4-12-84 revoking the licence.

( 2 ) THE case of the petitioner is that he was a peaceful citizen and on the basis of some false report lodged against him at Police Station Thariyaon, Fatehpur, and without any information to the petitioner or without issuing any notice as to why not the licence No. 359 of his S. B. B. L. Gun No. 4962-79 may be suspended or revoked, his licence was cancelled by the impugned order dated 4-12-84. A










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top