B.L.YADAV
RAJENDRA KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
3rd ADDL. DIST. JUDGE, MORADABAD – Respondent
( 1 ) BY this petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India the orders D/-16-5-88 passed by the III Additional District judge, Moradabad and the order D/-13-8-87 passed by the Munsif, Chandausi, Moradabad, on the application under O. 21, R. 97, C. P. C. (for short the Code) filed by the decree-holder, respondent 3 in a suit for ejectment from the accommodation in dispute are sought to be quashed.
( 2 ) THE petitioner is son of the Sheo Shankar, who was a party to the suit No. 241/66 filed by respondent No. 3 for the ejectment of Sheo Shankar and one more person. That suit was decreed on the basis of a compromise (43-Ka ). To execute that decree an application was filed by respondent 3 (Execution Case No. 200/72 ). In that application prayer was that the ejectment of judgment-debtor may be effected and the amount in the decree may be paid to decree-holder. Parwana Dakhal was issued. On that the Amin made a report that without the assistance of police no effective execution can be carried out on the spot by ejectment of the judgment-debtor. On 25-3-82 the execution application was dismissed. Appeal against that order also failed. Thereafter matter was taken to t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.