SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(All) 362

B.L.YADAV
RAJENDRA KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
3rd ADDL. DIST. JUDGE, MORADABAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.N.AGARWAL

B. L. YADAV, J.

( 1 ) BY this petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India the orders D/-16-5-88 passed by the III Additional District judge, Moradabad and the order D/-13-8-87 passed by the Munsif, Chandausi, Moradabad, on the application under O. 21, R. 97, C. P. C. (for short the Code) filed by the decree-holder, respondent 3 in a suit for ejectment from the accommodation in dispute are sought to be quashed.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is son of the Sheo Shankar, who was a party to the suit No. 241/66 filed by respondent No. 3 for the ejectment of Sheo Shankar and one more person. That suit was decreed on the basis of a compromise (43-Ka ). To execute that decree an application was filed by respondent 3 (Execution Case No. 200/72 ). In that application prayer was that the ejectment of judgment-debtor may be effected and the amount in the decree may be paid to decree-holder. Parwana Dakhal was issued. On that the Amin made a report that without the assistance of police no effective execution can be carried out on the spot by ejectment of the judgment-debtor. On 25-3-82 the execution application was dismissed. Appeal against that order also failed. Thereafter matter was taken to t










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top