SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(All) 646

A.N.DIKSHITA
PHIRARI SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sidharth Shukla

A. N. DIKSHITA, J.

( 1 ) THE applicant has filed this application under S. 482, Cr. P. C. praying for quashing the impugned orders dated 21-12-1982 and 12-7-1983 passed by X Additional Munsif Magistrate, Gorakhpur and VII Addl. Sessions Judge, Gorakhpur, respectively and also for dismissing the application filed by the Opp. Party 2 under S. 125, Cr. P. C.

( 2 ) THE facts in a narrow compass are that there is a long standing enmity between the applicant on the one side and the father and uncle of the opp. party 2 Smt. Ramawati Devi (daughter of Ram Samujh) on the other so much so that criminal cases and civil suits were filed by either of the parties since the year 1975. Sri Udai Raj Singh, nephew of the applicant was successfully elected Block Pramukh in successive elections since long, though father and uncle of opp. party 2 had supported rival candidate against Udairaj Singh. Panchoo alias Prem Narain, uncle of opp. party 2 was a notorious person and had been dismissed from the U. P. Police Service on serious charges.

( 3 ) ON account of strained relationship and bitter feud between the parties Ram Samujh, father of opp. party 2 and Panehoo alias Prem Narain got an application fil



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top