SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(All) 604

A.N.VERMA
JAI NARAIN – Appellant
Versus
RAM NARAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.P.SINGH, S.B.L.SRIVASTAVA

A. N. VERMA, J.


( 1 ) THIS is defendants second appeal arising out of suit for declaration, permanent injunction and possession in respect of a piece of land measuring 20 x 6 north south and 13 x 10 east west. The trial Court dismissed the suit. On appeal by the plaintiff, the suit has been decreed by the learned District Judge, Mirzapur. Hence the second appeal.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY, the plaint case was that one Amresh Chand Pandey, the admitted owner and Zamindar of the land granted a piece of land measuring 45 x 6" north south and 13 x 10" east west on parjawatdari (license) on payment of Re. 1/- annually in June 1956 in favour of the plaintiff. The license was granted to the plaintiff with a right to construct a house thereon. In pursuance of that licence, the plaintiff constructed a pacca house over a substantial part of the land granted to him. He wanted to construct over remaining part of the land also and with that end in view foundation was laid, for the same but the same was left unbuilt by the plaintiff and is being used as his sehan appurtenant to the house constructed by him. In the year 1971, however, the Zamindar and his co-sharers granted a lease in favour of the defendant,












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top