SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(All) 126

B.N.SAPRU
M/s. RADHA KISHAN RAM SARAN – Appellant
Versus
BENI RAM FAKIR CHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.N.BHARGAWA, R.A.Sharma, SUDHIR NARAIN AGARWAL

B. N. SAPRU, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision under Section 75 (1) of the Provincial Insolvency Act.

( 2 ) THE applicant filed an insolvency petition in the court of Insolvency Judge for adjudging the respondents as insolvents on the ground that the respondents did not pay a sum of Rs. 48,522/- which became due and also had committed various acts of insolvency including, making fictitious entries in their account.

( 3 ) THE petition was presented on 28-7-1986 before notice could be issued on the petition, the respondents put in appearance and opposed the application for appointment of interim receiver. The said application was rejected on 12-8-1986 by the Insolvency Judge with the consent of the parties. The respondents also deposited in court fixed deposit receipts of Rs. 50,000/- in order to show that they possessed sufficient assets and money to pay off the debt of the applicant and did not commit any act of insolvency.

( 4 ) THEREAFTER, an application was presented by the respondents, being application No. 45c for dismissing the insolvency petition and requested the court to exercise the powers under S. 25 of the Act. This application has been allowed by the court. An appeal preferre

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top