SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(All) 296

B.L.YADAV
DMA NATH MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


B. L. YADAV, J.


( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the order dated 10-1-1985 passed by the Special Judge, Varanasi allowing the appeal and setting aside the conviction and sentence passed against the applicant and sending back the case to the Magistrate for retrial according to law in the light of observations made in the order

( 2 ) THE facts of the case lie in a very narrow compass and they are these The applicant was convicted and sentenced for imprisonment for a period of one year and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment to one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months for an. offence under sections 467/468/409 IPC as the applicant was alleged to have withdrawn a sum of Rs 5500/- from Account No SBA/c No. 498767 of one Salik Singh by forging the signature of the depositor. In the complaintil; was alleged that the present applicant has embezzled the aforesaid amount in the capacity of a public servant.

( 3 ) EVEN though P. W. 1 Han Lal Gupta, Inspector Post Offices, P. W. 2 Santu Ram, clerk, P. W. 3 Babu Lal Ram, P. W. 4 Triloki Nath, P. W. 5 Salik Singh and P. W. 6 Kanhaiya Ram clerk in the Post Office were exami









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top