( 1 ) THE grievance of the petition in the case is that during the pendency of the appeal before it, the customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi has refused to grant stay of recovery of the amount directed to be paid by the petitioner by order of the Collector of Central excise, Allahabad. The Copy of the order of the Tribunal is Annexure a-6 to the petition. The tribunal has asked the petitioner (Appellant before it) to deposit a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- in cash and secure the balance of the duty amount (amounting to Rs. 1,37,289/52) by way of Bank guarantee within a period of six weeks from the date of the order. It has stayed the recovery of the amount of penalty in respect of the appellants.

( 2 ) ONE of the pleas which the appellant had taken before the Tribunal is that the demand was time barred. This ground has specifically been mentioned in the application for stay made by the petitioner before the Tribunal. The Tribunal has noticed this plea, in its order of April 22, 1987, but has not said anything specifically about it while dealing with the submission made before it. A matter similar to this arose before this. Court earlier also. In Hari Fertilizers

Click Here to Read the rest of this document