SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(All) 8

A.S.SRIVASTAVA, UMESH C.BANERJEE
VIKRAM PRATAP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DAYA SHANKAR MISHRA, DELEEP KUMAR, P.N.KATJU, P.N.TRIPATHI

A. S. SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) BY means of this petition filed under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Vikram Pratap Singh has challenged the order of his detention dated 11-2-1985 passed under S. 3 (2) of the National Security Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by the district Magistrate, Varanasi (hereinafter referred to as the detaining authority ).

( 2 ) THE order of detention was served on the petitioner the same day. It was based only on one ground which related to an incident which had taken place on 10-10-1984 at 2. 30 A. M. outside the Tato Gate of the Railway Station, Varanasi Cantt. in which the petitioner is alleged to have pushed Sri O. P. Gupta, Divisional Engineer Mechanical, North-Eastern Railway, Varanasi when he was about to board a jeep after getting down from his saloon for his residence. The petitioner did not only push Sri Gupta but also fired at him with his revolver causing him fatal injury. The FIR of this incident was lodged at P. S. G. R. P. Cantt. by Sri S. K. Mukerjee, on the basis of which Crime case No. 322 of 1984 under S. 302 I. P. C. was registered. The petitioner was, however, not named in this F. I. R. A test identification















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top