SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(All) 43

H.N.SETH, J.N.DUBEY
BRAMHANAND RAI – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, GHAZIPUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.N.BHARGAWA, G.P.BHARGAWA, KESHAV PRASAD SINGH, R.N.SINGHA

J. N. DUBEY, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition has come up for hearing before us on a reference made by a learned single Judge of this Court on his doubting the correctness of the two single Judge decisions of this Court in Brij Lal v. Deputy Director of Consolidation Lucknow Camp at Lucknow 1982 All WC 862 and Nathai v. Joint Director of Consolidation, Allahabad 1984 All LJ 324.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case are these. In the basic year the land in dispute was recorded in the name of opposite party No. 4 Smt. Madina Bibi. Petitioners Brahmanand Rai and Basudeo Rai filed objection under S. 9a (2) of the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) claiming Sirdari rights in the land in dispute on the basis of the lease executed in their favour by the Zamindar Sri Mahadeo Rai on 27-5-1950. The objection was contested by the opposite party No. 4 Smt. Madina Bibi on the ground that she had purchased the land in dispute from Lugari Rai son of Mahadeo Rai on 30-9-1954 and since then she has been in possession thereof. The Consolidation Officer who heard the objection rejected it on 9-8-1970. Petitioners filed appeal to the Settlement Officer Consolidation which


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top