SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(All) 394

OM PRAKASH
RAM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
KAZI MOHIUDDIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
k.N.TRIPATHI, R.K.JAIN, V.C.TRIPATHI

OM PRAKASH, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Order 6, Rule 16 C. P. C. by the respondent no. 1 praying that the paragraphs Nos. 7 to 71 of the election petition be struck out, inasmuch as they do not disclose material facts and cause of action.

( 2 ) THE petitioner who was one of the candidates has filed the petition under Section 81 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (the Act, 1951 in brief) calling in question the election of the respondent No. 1 to the U. P. Legislative Assembly from 420 Roorkee Legislative Assembly Constituency with the prayer that (1) the election of the respondent No. 1 be declared void and be set aside; and (2) that the petitioner be declared elected instead from the aforesaid constituency.

( 3 ) FOR electing the members of the U. P. Legislative Assembly, general elections took place in March, 1985. Last date of filing the nomination paper was 6-2-1985 and the last date of withdrawal was 9-2-1985. The poll took place on 5-3-1985. The accounting was done on 6th March, 1985 and then the respondent No. 1 was declared elected. The petitioner and all the respondents contested the election.


( 4 ) THE petitioner has challenged the election of the respond






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top