SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(All) 56

V.P.MATHUR
RAFUQUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
BASHIR AHMAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Palok Basu, V.K.Chaturvedi, V.K.Sharma

V. P. MATHUR, J.


( 1 ) THESE two petitions are directed against the same judgment passed by Sri K. M. Chaturvedi, VI Additional Sessions Judge, Agra, dated 20-7-1984, in Criminal Misc. Bail Cancellation Application No. 1800 of 1983. The learned Additional Sessions Judge allowed the application moved by Bashir Ahmad and cancelled the bail granted earlier by the Magistrate, to Rafiuddin, Salahuddin and Samiuddin. It is contended that this order was beyond the jurisdiction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, who had no power to dispose of an application of this type in view of Section 10 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and who also could not cancel the bail once granted by the Magistrate without coming to the conclusion that the accused had abused the bailor were not justified to continue on bail that was granted.

( 2 ) SINCE both the cases raise the same point for determination, they have, on the request of the counsel on both the sides, been taken up together and are being disposed of by this order.

( 3 ) THE first point is about the capacity of an Additional Sessions Judge to dispose of an application for bailor for cancellation of the bail.

( 4 ) SECTION 10 (3) of the new Cr













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top