SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(All) 154

R.P.SAXENA
KALPANA – Appellant
Versus
SURENDRA NATH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
PUNAM SRIVASTAV, S.M.DAYAL

R. P. SAXENA, J.

( 1 ) THIS second appeal has been filed against by judgment and decree dt. 28th Mar. 1984 passed by the lower appellate Court confirming the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court whereby the petition for divorce under S. 13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act was allowed.

( 2 ) THE parties were married on 10-12-1980 and they lived together for a month and a half. The petition was filed with the allegations that during her stay with the respondent the appellant humiliated the respondent by refusing to make tea for his friends. It was said that on the appellants desire, the respondent got her admitted in a college for further studies. One day the appellant went on the pretext of going to college and did not come back. On 21st Jan. , 1981 she lodged a report against the respondent and his relations for offences under S. 307/406/34 IPC and also under S. 4, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. Cases were registered against the respondent and his relations and warrants were issued against them. They had to obtain bail from the court. The police submitted final report in the case under S. 307/406/34 IPC. The other case also did not proceed. The appellant had started vomitin













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top