SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(All) 273

S.K.DHAON
SARDAR HASAN SIDDIQUI – Appellant
Versus
S. T. A. TRIBUNAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.P.Naitham

S. K. DHAON, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners have invoked Art. 226 of the Constitution and have challenged the legality of an order dated 18th May 1982, passed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, U. P. , Lucknow (hereinafter referred to as the Appellate Tribunal) setting aside a resolution dated 16th October. 1981, passed by the Regional Transport Authority, Moradabad (hereinafter referred to as the Transport Authority) including a portion of an independent route in their existing permits for stage carriages and remanding the matter for reconsideration by a duly constituted authority.

( 2 ) THE petitioners were existing permit-holders of one of the three routes which were Nagma-Kalagarh-via-Afzalgarh (hereinafter referred to as route No. (1); Nagina-Jaspur-via-Afzalgarh (hereinafter referred to as route No. 2), and Kashipur-Kalagarh-via-Jaspur (hereinafter referred to as route No. 3 ). Petitioners Nos. 1 to 8 (hereinafter referred to as the petitioners 1st set) the existing permit-holders of route No. 1 made applications under S. 57 (8) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for the inclusion of routes Nos. 2 and 3 in their existing permits. The petitio





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top