K.N.SINGH, A.N.DIKSHITA
KASHMIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) BOTH these petitions involve common questions of law and fact. We are disposing of both these petitions by a common order at the admission stage with the consent of the counsel for the parties.
( 2 ) THE petitioners are owners of the plots situate in village Sonera, tehsil Kichha district Nainital. Their land is being acquired under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. A notification under S. 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was issued on 6-5-1985 declaring that the land in question including the petitioners land was needed for a public purpose, namely, for construction of market yard for the Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Kichha. The notification further contained a declaration that since there was urgency for the acquisition, the provisions of Ss. 17 (1-A) and 17 (4) shall apply and the provisions of S. 5-A of the Act shall not apply. On the same date, namely, May 6, 1985, another notification was issued by the State Government under S. 6 of the Act making declaration that the land in dispute was required for a public purpose, namely, for the construction of market yard for the Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Kichha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.