SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(All) 358

K.N.SINGH, A.N.DIKSHITA
KASHMIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
JAGDISH S.JOSHI

K. N. SINGH, J.

( 1 ) BOTH these petitions involve common questions of law and fact. We are disposing of both these petitions by a common order at the admission stage with the consent of the counsel for the parties.


( 2 ) THE petitioners are owners of the plots situate in village Sonera, tehsil Kichha district Nainital. Their land is being acquired under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. A notification under S. 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was issued on 6-5-1985 declaring that the land in question including the petitioners land was needed for a public purpose, namely, for construction of market yard for the Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Kichha. The notification further contained a declaration that since there was urgency for the acquisition, the provisions of Ss. 17 (1-A) and 17 (4) shall apply and the provisions of S. 5-A of the Act shall not apply. On the same date, namely, May 6, 1985, another notification was issued by the State Government under S. 6 of the Act making declaration that the land in dispute was required for a public purpose, namely, for the construction of market yard for the Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Kichha




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top