SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(All) 30

K.C.AGRAWAL, R.A.MISRA, B.N.KATJU
SURJEET SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.S.MISRA, GURPRIT SINGH

B. N. KATJU, J.

( 1 ) THE applicant filed an application for bail on 26/8/1983 under section 439 Criminal Procedure Code. It is stated in the application that a charge sheet was submitted against the applicant on 31/1/1983 under Sections 302/1491148/147 Indian Penal Code in the Court of Munsif Magistrate III, Haldwani. The case of the applicant was committed to the Court of Sessions on 26-2-1983 under Section 209 Criminal Procedure Code and on the same day a warrant was issued by the learned Magistrate in which it was mentioned that the applicant be produced before, the Court of Sessions on 103. 1983. In the aforesaid warrant it was not mentioned that the applicant was remanded to custody during and until the conclusion of the trial.

( 2 ) IT is mentioned in the order sheet of the II Additional Sessions Judge, Nainital that on 1/3/1983 the committal order dated 26/2/1983 was received from the Court of III Additional Munsif Magistrate Haldwani along with the calender and the record of the case against the applicant and it was ordered that the case be registered and the file be put up for fixing the date of hearing in the near future. The case was again put up for orders on 16/4/1983


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top