SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(All) 299

K.N.GOYAL
FARUKH – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT JUDGE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.SINGH, A.R.KHAN, V.C.Verma, Z.JILANI

K. N. GOYAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition has been filed by three of the judgment-debtors against execution proceedings pending against them in the Court of the Munsif North, lucknow.

( 2 ) OPPOSITE party No. 3 as the landlady of the certain accommodation situated in the city of Lucknow filed a suit for ejectment in the Court of Munsif North. This was suit No. 492 of 1967. The tenant was one Najmur Rahman. He was defendant No. 1 in the suit. Four other persons were impleaded as defendants, namely, Mohammad Hasnain, Karam Khan Farukh, and Imran son of mohammad Hasnain. Out of them Karam Khan has died and is represented by srimati Noor Jehan petitioner No. 2, Imran is opposite party No. 4. Petitioner no. 3 and opposite parties 5 and 8 are other heirs of Mohammad Hasnain. Opposite parties 9 to 17 are the heirs of Najmur Rahman.

( 3 ) THE contention of the plaintiff, was that the tenant, namely, Najmur Rahman had committed a wilful default in payment of arrears of rent and had also sublet the premises to the other defendants mentioned above. The trial Court upheld both these pleas and decreed the suit for ejectment and rent. The lower appellate Court upheld the finding of wilful default






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top