SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(All) 485

N.D.OJHA, B.D.AGRAWAL
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
CHANDU LAL SURAJPAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BHARATJI AGARWAL, M.Katju, R.S.AGRAWAL

OJHA, J.

( 1 ) DURING the assessment year in question, namely, 1970-71, the assessee-respondcnt, which is a registered firm, had five partners inducing Sri J. P. Bhartiya and Sri G. L. Bhartiya. These two persons were partners in their representative capacity as karta of their respective Hindu individed families. During the said assessment year. , the partnership had paid interest to the aforesaid two persons in the sum of Rs. 18,585 and Rs. 12,372, respectively. The assessee claimed deduction of these amounts which was disallowed by the Income-tax Officer. On appeal, the Appellate assistant Commissioner confirmed the order of the Income-tax Officer in this behalf. The tribunal, however, on further appeal, took the view that the interest appeared to have been paid to the aforesaid two persons in their individual capacity and allowed the appeal and granted the deduction claimed by the respondent. The Commissioner of Income-tax made an application under Section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as "the Act", for referring the following question of law to this court for its opinion : "whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal w





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top