SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(All) 523

S.K.DHAON
RAM YASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.P.DIXIT, G.S.Hajela, K.S.TEVARI

S. K. DHAON, J.

( 1 ) THIS criminal revision and the companion Criminal Misc. Application under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the New Code) are directed against the same order dated 26th May, 1984, passed by the Munsif Magistrate, Etawah, summoning the applicants for haying committed an alleged offence under sections 147, 148, 326 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. They can, therefore be conveniently disposed of by a common judgment.

( 2 ) A complaint was filed by opposite party No. 2, Ram Bharosey, setting out the facts which constitute the offences alleged to have been committed by the applicants. Paragraphs 18 and 19 of the complaint are relevant and may be quoted as below:

18 That the complainant has now learnt that the police is intending the challan of the complainants, party and file a report in the complainants case. 19. That in order to prevent such an event which is contrary to justice and fair play which requires both the cases to be investigated and sent up, the complainant has no option but to file this complaint"

( 3 ) THE only submission made on behalf of the applicants is that in view of the afore-quoted av























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top