SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(All) 499

B.N.SAPRU
RAM SUCHIT – Appellant
Versus
1st ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, GORAKHPUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V.B.Khare

B. N. SAPRU, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition has been filed by Ram Suchit and Ram Sumer sons of Baldeo and is directed against an order of the I Additional District Judge, Gorakhpur, whereby he has allowed Civil Revision No. 44 of 1981, Chhedi v. Basdeo and 2 others, and as a result of the revisional order, the petitioners application for being impleaded as parties in Suit No. 153 of 1979 stood dismissed.

( 2 ) THE short facts of the case are that Basdeo, the respondent No. 3, was the owner of the half share of Plot No. 256 having a total area of 1. 88 Acres. According to the petitioners, Basdeo executed a sale deed in their favour on 26-11-1977 for. 03 decimal land. Thereafter on 5-12-1977 he executed a sale deed of another. 03 decimal of land in favour of Chhedi.

( 3 ) CHHEDI instituted Suit No. 153 of 1979 for rectification of the sale deed dated 5-12-1977 executed by Basdeo in favour of the respondent Chhedi, inter alia, on the ground that the reference to. 03 decimal of the area should be deleted from the sale deed, the sale consideration should be mentioned as 15,000 rupees and another area of land possessed by Basdeo in plot No. 256 which was half of 1. 88 Acres, shall be deemed










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top