SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(All) 64

M.WAHAJUDDIN
RAJESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V.P.Srivastava

M. WAHAJUDDIN, J.


( 1 ) THE applicants figured as accused persons in criminal case No. 1410/9/1981 which was pending in the court of C. J. M. Moradabad. It is stated that on 26. 1. 1977 the premises of the applicants were searched and 4 bars of Primary Gold are alleged to have been found concealed there, in a secret chamber, in the back of the shop. On such information being furnished by Income Tax Authorities to the authorities of Central Excise proceeding under Gold (Control) Act of 1965 was initiated and ultimately a complaint was filed under Section 8 of that Act by opposite party No. 3, namely, Assistant Collector Excise, Rampur. It is alleged that in pursuance of a Government Notification of September 16, 1982 for constituting Special courts for offences under various Central Acts including Gold (Control) Act 1968, issued by the Government, the court further issued notification No. 569 of 18. 10. 1982 appointing Sri R. K. Gupta Chief Judicial Magistrate, Allahabad as Judicial Magistrate First Class to preside over the Special court to try cases under specified Central Acts including Gold (Control) Act 1968 and the aforesaid case was then transferred to the aforesaid Special c


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top