SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(All) 398

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
H. N. Seth and A. Banerji, JJ.
COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX - Appellant
Versus
KADERUL SEHAT DAWAKHANA - Respondents
Sales Tax Revision 345 Of 1982
Decided On : 12/16/1983

The activity of dispensing medicines by the dealers constituted 'manufacture' as defined in Section 2 (e-1) of the U. P. Sales Tax Act, 1948, and the medicines dispensed by them were 'manufactured goods'.

Headnote:

MANUFACTURE - DEFINITION - U. P. SALES TAX ACT, 1948 - SECTION 2 (E-1) - INTERPRETATION - SCOPE AND AMBIT - ACTIVITY OF DISPENSING MEDICINES - WHETHER CONSTITUTES MANUFACTURE - HELD: YES

Fact of the Case:

The dealers, M/s. Kaderul Sehat Dawakhana and M/s. Rafekul Sehat Dawakhana, were involved in the business of dispensing and selling medicines in Sambhal, Moradabad. They were assessed to tax under Section 21 of the U. P. Sales Tax Act, 1948, for the years 1976-77 and 1977-78, respectively, for the turnover of sales of medicines dispensed by them on the basis of Hakim Rais Ahmad's prescription. The dealers challenged the assessments, contending that they were not manufacturers of the medicines and, therefore, not liable to pay tax. The Sales Tax Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the dealers and set aside the assessments. The Commissioner of Sales Tax filed revision applications before the High Court.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court held that the activity of dispensing medicines by the dealers constituted 'manufacture' as defined in Section 2 (e-1) of the U. P. Sales Tax Act, 1948. The Court observed that the definition of 'manufacture' in the Act was wide and included within its ambit not only activities that resulted in the creation of a new commercial commodity but also activities that involved processing, treating, or adapting goods. The Court further held that the medicines dispensed by the dealers were 'manufactured goods' as they had been subjected to a manufacturing process, namely, the mixing of various ingredients in the proportion indicated in the hakim's prescription, and were adapted for specific use by the patients for whom they were prepared.

Issues: 1. Whether the activity of dispensing medicines by the dealers constituted 'manufacture' as defined in Section 2 (e-1) of the U. P. Sales Tax Act, 1948? 2. Whether the medicines dispensed by the dealers were 'manufactured goods'?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The definition of 'manufacture' in Section 2 (e-1) of the U. P. Sales Tax Act, 1948, is wide and includes within its ambit not only activities that result in the creation of a new commercial commodity but also activities that involve processing, treating, or adapting goods. 2. The medicines dispensed by the dealers were 'manufactured goods' as they had been subjected to a manufacturing process, namely, the mixing of various ingredients in the proportion indicated in the hakim's prescription, and were adapted for specific use by the patients for whom they were prepared.

Final Decision: The High Court allowed the revision applications filed by the Commissioner of Sales Tax and set aside the order of the Sales Tax Tribunal. The assessments passed by the Sales Tax Officer and affirmed by the Assistant Commissioner (Judicial), Moradabad, in appeal in the cases of the two assessees were restored.

H. N. SETH, J.

( 1 ) AS the learned single Judge before whom these two connected sales tax revision applications came up for hearing felt that the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Sales Tax v. Bharat Oxygen, Lucknow 1980 UPTC 686 on which the Sales Tax Tribunal had placed reliance while disposing of the appeal before it, required reconsideration, he vide his order dated 20th December, 1982, directed that these cases be listed before a larger Bench and this is how the matter has come up before us.

( 2 ) THE two dealers involved in these cases carried on the business of dispensing and selling medicines in the names of M/s. Kaderul Sehat Dawakhana and M/s. Rafekul Sehat Dawakhana at Sambhal in the district of Moradabad. In due course their assessments for the years 1976-77 (in the case of M/s. Kaderul Sehat Dawakhana) and 1977-78 (in the case of M/s. Rafekul Sehat dawakhana) were reopened under Section 21 of the U. P. Sales Tax Act as it was felt that the turnover of sales of medicines dispensed by them on the basis of Hakim Rais Ahmads prescription and supplied to various patients had escaped assessment.

( 3 ) THE Sales Tax Officer concluded that during the relevant assessment years the two assessees had sold certain medicines prescribed by Hakim Rais Ahmad after purchasing the same from the market. Likewise they also sold to various patients medicines prescribed by Hakim Rais Ahmad after dispensing the same from the ingredients which they had purchased from kirana dealers. The two dealers could, in so far as the medicines dispensed by them from out of the ingredients purchased from kirana dealers were concerned be treated to be manufacturers thereof inasmuch as the characteristics of the ingredients had while dispensing of medicines, undergone a basic change. Turnover of sale of such medicines was liable to be taxed under the U. P. Sales Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) but it had, in the relevant years, escaped assessment. The sales Tax Officer accordingly determined the escaped turnover of the medicines dispensed by the two dealers and assessed them to tax accordingly.

( 4 ) THE order passed by the Sales Tax Officer was affirmed in appeal by the Assistant commissioner (J.), Sales Tax, Moradabad. The dealers then went up in second appeal before the sales Tax Tribunal. The Tribunal referred to following observation made by this Court in the case of Commissioner of Sales Tax v. Bharat Oxygen, Lucknow 1980 UPTC 686 : the following ingredients are necessary to constitute manufacture :

(a) there must be a change in substance, and a different article must emerge having a distinctive character and use from the raw material by the use of physical labour or by mechanical process; (b) the articles produced either by physical labour or by mechanical process should be on a large scale and should pass as a commercial commodity from hand to hand.

and held that as the medicines prepared by the two dealers by mixing kirana goods and herbs on the basis of prescriptions from a hakim were meant to be sold to individual patients only once, they could not be held to be manufacturers of such medicines and the notice issued to them under section 21 of the U. P. Sales Tax Act as also the orders passed in proceedings initiated thereunder deserved to be set aside. In the result the Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the dealers and set aside the assessments made against them under Section 21 of the Act. Aggrieved, the Commissioner of Sales Tax approached this Court for relief by way of revision under Section 11 (1) of the Act.

( 5 ) WHEN these revision applications came up for hearing before the learned single Judge, the learned standing counsel appearing for the Commissioner of Sales Tax submitted that when on the basis of hakims prescriptions the two dealers prepared the medicines after mixing herbs with kirana goods and sold the same to individual patients, their activity resulted in manufacture of medicines [as de
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top