SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(All) 325

V.K.MEHROTRA
RAM BHAROSEY LAL – Appellant
Versus
RAMESHWAR DAYAL CHAKKIWALA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.S.Verma, TRILOKI NATH

V. K. MEHROTRA, J.

( 1 ) RAM Bharosey Lal, who is applicant before this Court in the present revision under Section 115, C. P. C. obtained a decree for rejectment of Ram-eshwar Dayal Chakkiwala as well as ashok Kumar, the two opposite parties in this revision. This was on April 23. 1975 and related to a house of which description, with reference to boundaries, was also contained in the plaint. The decree was assailed in this Court but affirmed However, there was an error in the decree prepared by the office of the first court, inasmuch as, the boundaries of the house were not mentioned therein. The decree-holder then made an application for correction of this error and the trial court, by its order dated May 15, 1975, directed the correction to be made. The correction was actually made on May 16, 1975. An application to recall the order of correction made by the judgment-debtors was rejected. Therefore, they assailed the order of correction in a revision before the District Judge but the revision was dismissed on the ground that it was not maintainable. The order in this regard was passed on August 25, 1975.

( 2 ) IN Sept. 1975 the decree was put into execution and an objection was










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top