K.N.SETH, R.R.RASTOGI
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
GOEL BROTHERS – Respondent
( 1 ) THE Income-tax Appellate Tribunal under Section 256 (2) of the I. T. Act, has referred the following question to this court for opinion :
"whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally justified in holding that the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to the assessee was barred by time ?"
The question relates to the income-tax assessment of M/s. Goel Brothers for the assessment years 1958-59, 1959-60 and 1960-61. M/s. Goel Brothers had filed income-tax return for the aforesaid years in the status of a firm. The ITO took the view that the business carried on in the name of M/s. Goel Brothers actually belonged to M/s. Kanodia Brothers and, consequently, the income returned by M/s. Goel Brothers was included in the income of Kanodia Brothers while making their assessments. Protective assessments were, however, made on M/s. Goel Brothers for all these years in the status of an unregistered firm.
( 2 ) M/s. Kanodia Brothers as well as M/s. Goel Brothers filed appeals to the AAC. M/s. Kanodia brothers pleaded that there was no justification for holding that the business carried on by M/s. Goel Brothers was
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.