SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(All) 68

DEOKI NANDAN
STATE OF U. P. – Appellant
Versus
PHOOL CHAND AGARWAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.MISHRA, V.K.Gupta

DEOKI NANDAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a second appeal by the State of Uttay Pradesh, Hem Chandra Joshi, District Industries officer has been added as the second appellant. The two respondents who are indisputably the owners of a house situate at Vikasnagar in the district of Dehradun the boundaries of which are described at the foot of the plaint, instituted the suit giving rise to the present second appeal, against the State of Uttar Pradesh, the said Hem Chandra Joshi, District Industries Officer dehradun and K. N. Rai. Foreman. Training-cum-Extension Centre. Vikasnagar tor possession over the house and for compensation for use and occupation, or mesne profits at Rs. 200/- per month for the period commencing 1st March. 1974 up to the date of delivery of possession over the house to the Plaintiffs. The facts as alleged in the plaint were that in August, 1980, the then district Industries Officer, Dehradun, approached Ramesh Chandra, the second plaintiff for taking the house on rent for the residence and office of the Incharge or Foreman, of the Training cum-Extension Centre, Vikasnagar. The second plaintiff, it is alleged, "offered to give the same on monthly rent of Rs. 200/ -. ", which






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top