SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(All) 633

R.B.LAL, K.N.SETH
MODI INDUSTRIES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BHARATJI AGARWAL

K. N. SETH, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER No. 1 is a public limited company carrying business of manufacturing vegetable oil, iron and steel, torch, soap, sugar paints, etc. , in its various units.

( 2 ) FOR the assessment year 1967-68 by an order dated 29th March, 1972, tax was assessed at Rs. 37,94,875. 76. Since a sum of Rs. 35,67,256. 43 had deposited by the assessee, a demand for the balance amount was issued b Sales Tax Officer. The petitioner made an application under section 22 Sales Tax Act pointing out certain apparent mistakes in the assessment inasmuch as credit for the entire amount deposited by the petitioner w; given in the assessment order. By an order dated 20th July, 1972, the or assessment order was rectified and the demand was reduced to Rs. 24,959. 24

( 3 ) THEREAFTER, a notice under Section 21 of the Act was issued by the Sale Officer and by an order dated 29th March, 1974, an additional demai Rs. 10,000 was created. Against the original assessment order as w against the order passed under Section 21 of the Act the petitioner filed a which were allowed by the Assistant Commissioner (Judicial), Sales Tax the case was remanded for fresh assessment. A fresh order of assessm












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top