SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(All) 38

S.J.HYDER, K.N.SINGH
JIYA LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.P.NAITHANI

HYDER, J.

( 1 ) THE controversy in this writ petition covered a wide range during the course of the arguments at the bar. We feel that it would not be necessary for us to deal with all the submissions urged on behalf of the parties as this writ petition must succeed on a short point.

( 2 ) THE petitioners, who are eleven in number, are holders of Stage Carriage Permits. Their vehicles ply on Muzaffarnagar Charthawal Garni Kalan route. On the said route, just before chartha-wal, the road crosses the river Hindan. In the year 1965, the State of U. P. constructed a bridge of sufficient strength to allow heavy vehicles to pass over it. A total sum of Rs. 6,70,000/was spent by the State Government on the construction of the bridge and its approach roads. There is no serious controversy between the parties in so far as these facts are concerned.

( 3 ) THE Indian Legislature passed Indian Tolls Act, 1851 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1851 ). It is an Act enabling the Government to levy tolls on public roads and bridges. The said act did not initially apply to the areas now forming part of the State of Uttar Pradesh. However, the Legislature passed another Act known as the Tolls A














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top