SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(All) 306

V.K.MEHROTRA
MAQSOON KHAN – Appellant
Versus
LALA BALWANT PRASAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.D.Prabhakar, S.A.KHAN

V. K. MEHROTRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a defendants Second Appeal who is aggrieved by a decree for recovery of a sum of Rs. 8,400/- with pendente lite and future interest at the rate of 6% per annum on Rs. 4,000/borrowed by him from the plaintiff. The lower appellate Court confirmed the decree passed by the trial Court.

( 2 ) THE finding which has been arrived at by the courts below concurrently is that after borrowing a sum of Rs. 4,000/- on Feb. 5, 1967 from the plaintiff, the defendant acknowledged his liability for re-payment of the amount by paying to the plaintiff a sum of Rs. 300/- on Jan. 1, 1970. There was an endorsement about this payment made at the back of the promissory note and the receipt through which the defendant acknowledged his liability. The defendant affixed his thumb mark below it. Both the courts disbelieved the plea of the defendant that he had not borrowed any money or that the promissory note and the receipt had been fabricated by the plaintiff.

( 3 ) THE courts below did not accept the defendants plea that the suit was barred by limitation. According to them, the suit was well within limitation as acknowledgment of his liability had been made by the defendant



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top