SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(All) 576

M.P.MEHROTRA
STATE OF U. P. – Appellant
Versus
SURAJ KUMAR GUPTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
RAJENDRA KUMAR, V.D.Singh

M. P. MEHROTRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition arises out of the proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation)Act, 1976. The facts, in brief, are these. The State of U. P. is the petitioner in this case. Respondent No. 1 Sri Suraj Kumar was issued the draft statement under Section 8 and objections were filed by, him. They were decided by the competent Authority by his order dated 21-9-77, a true copy whereof is annexure 1 to the petition. Thereafter an application dated 20-11-78 was moved seeking a fresh decision from the competent Authority. A true copy of the said application dated 20-11-78 is annexure 2 to the petition, Thereafter the Competent Authority reopened the case and by his order dated 23-2-79 held that the said respondent No. 1 Sri Suraj Kumar had 328,62 sq. meters of surplus vacant land. A true copy of the order of the said authority dated 23-2-79 is annexure 3 to the petition, respondent No, 1 thereafter filed an appeal and the same was allowed by the appellate authority by his judgment dated 21-12-79, a true copy of which is annexure 4 to the petition, A certified copy of the said judgment is also on record.

( 2 ) FEELING aggrieved, the State has now come up in






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top