SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(All) 505

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
A. Banerji, J.
RAM KHELAWAN MISRA - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P - Respondents
Civil Misc. Writ 4670 Of 1979
Decided On : 11/17/1981

Advocates Appeared:
R.K.DWIVEDI

The genuineness of the need for a rifle is not a ground for refusing a license under Section 14 of the Arms Act, 1959.

Headnote:

ARMS ACT, 1959 - SECTION 13(2), 13(3)(B), 14 - LICENCE FOR RIFLE - GROUNDS FOR REFUSAL - GENUINENESS OF NEED NOT A GROUND - ORDER REFUSING LICENCE ON THIS GROUND IS UNSUSTAINABLE.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner applied for a license for a rifle, which was denied by the District Magistrate and the Commissioner on the ground that the petitioner's need was not genuine. The petitioner challenged the orders, arguing that the need for a rifle was a genuine one and that the District Magistrate's reason for refusing the license was not a valid ground under the Arms Act, 1959.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the District Magistrate's order was not in accordance with law and that the reason given for refusing the license, that the petitioner's need was not genuine, was not a valid ground under Section 14 of the Arms Act, 1959. The court further held that the Commissioner's order in appeal was also not sustainable as it did not find any justifiable ground to interfere with the District Magistrate's order.

Issues: Whether the District Magistrate's order refusing the license was in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the District Magistrate's order was not in accordance with law as the reason given for refusing the license, that the petitioner's need was not genuine, was not a valid ground under Section 14 of the Arms Act, 1959. The court further held that the Commissioner's order in appeal was also not sustainable as it did not find any justifiable ground to interfere with the District Magistrate's order.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the orders passed by the Commissioner and the District Magistrate, and sent the case back to the District Magistrate for a fresh consideration of the petitioner's application for the grant of a license for a rifle.

A. BANERJI, J.


( 1 ) THIS writ petition has been filed by the petitioner Ram Khelawan Misra, a resident of village samgara Tahsil and Police Station Baberu district Banda, against the orders passed by the district Magistrate, Banda, dated 12th Jan. 1979 and the Commissioner, Jhansi Division, jhansi, dated 30th Mar. 1979 refusing to grant a licence for a rifle to the petitioner. The petitioner has challenged the order passed by the District Magistrate on the ground that the order is not in accordance with law and the reason given by the District Magistrate that the need of the applicant is not genuine is not a valid ground for refusing the licence. The order of the commissioner in appeal has also been challenged on the same ground.

( 2 ) A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents in which ii was stated that the impugned order was passed after carefully going through the record and after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and keeping in view all facts and circumstances of the case. In the rejoinder affidavit, it has been re-asserted that the need of the petitioner was genuine, as the rifle was required for the protection of his life and property.

( 3 ) I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the Standing Counsel and perused the material on the record.

( 4 ) A person wanting to possess a fire-arm must obtain a licence for the same. He has to apply for the licence to the licensing authority for the grant of a licence in the prescribed form. Section 13 (2) of the Arms Act, 1959 makes it clear that on receipt of an application the licensing authority after making such enquiry as may be necessary and subject to the provisions of Chap. III may grant or refuse to grant the licence. It is incumbent that the order is passed in writing. Subject to the above, the licensing authority is required to issue a licence under Section 3 of the Arms Act, 1959, hereinafter referred to as the Act, where the licence is required by a citizen of India in respect of a smooth bore gun having a barrel of not less than twenty inches in length to be used for protection or sport or in respect of a muzzle loading gun to be used for bona fide crop protection, or in respect of a point 22 bore rifle or an air rifle to be used for target practice by a member of a rifle club or rifle association licensed or recognised by the Central Government. He is also required to issue a licence in respect of a fire arm other than the above if the licensing authority is satisfied that the person by whom the licence is required has good reason for obtaining the same. Section 13 (2) of the Act speaks of smooth bore gun and a muzzle loading gun and point 22 bore rifle or an air rifle. It does not speak of a rifle. A rifle is not a smooth bore gun. Therefore, in respect of a rifle or for that matter any of the arms which comes under the provisions of Section 4 or a licence for the manufacture, sale, etc. of arms and ammunition as mentioned in Section 5 or a licence for the shortening of guns or conversion of imitation firearms into firearms mentioned in Section 6 or a licence for import or export of arms or for transporting of arms, the licensing authority has to be satisfied that the person asking for the licence has a good reason for obtaining the same. It is obvious from the above that the grant of a licence in the case of a smooth bore gun stands on a different footing than that of a rifle. In the case of a smooth bore gun all that a person has to satisfy the licensing authority is that it is required for protection or sport. In the case of a rifle the applicant has to satisfy the licensing authority that he has a good reason for obtaining the rifle.

( 5 ) IN the present case, the petitioner has asked for a licence for a rifle. He was, therefore, required to show a good reason for obtaining the same. Section 14 of the Act lays down the grounds for refusal of the licence. Section 14 of the Act reads as follows:--

"14. Refusal of li











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top