SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(All) 120

DEOKI NANDAN
RAJPAL – Appellant
Versus
DHARAMAVATI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.N.Sharma

DEOKI NANDAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against an order dated 8th Dec. , 1977 under Section 24 of the Hindu marriage Act in a Matrimonial Suit No. 81 of 1977 of the District Court, Saharanpur. The order under appeal directs the appellant to pay Rs. 110/-per month as maintenance pendente lite from the date of the application under Section 24, and Rs. 300/- as litigation expenses. The payment had to be made within one month from the date of the order which was 8th Dec. , 1977.

( 2 ) THE appeal is on the face of it incompetent. Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act reads as follows after its amendment in 1976:

"28. Appeal from decrees and orders:- (1) All decrees made by the Court in any proceeding under this Act shall, subject to the provisions of Sub-section (3), be appealable as decrees of the Court made in the exercise of its original civil jurisdiction, and every such appeal shall lie to the Court to which appeals ordinarily lie from the decisions of the Court given in the exercise of its original civil jurisdiction. (2) Orders made by the Court in any proceeding under this Act, under Section 25 or Section 26 shall, subject to the provisions of Sub-section (3), be appealabl





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top