DEOKI NANDAN
RAJPAL – Appellant
Versus
DHARAMAVATI – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against an order dated 8th Dec. , 1977 under Section 24 of the Hindu marriage Act in a Matrimonial Suit No. 81 of 1977 of the District Court, Saharanpur. The order under appeal directs the appellant to pay Rs. 110/-per month as maintenance pendente lite from the date of the application under Section 24, and Rs. 300/- as litigation expenses. The payment had to be made within one month from the date of the order which was 8th Dec. , 1977.
( 2 ) THE appeal is on the face of it incompetent. Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act reads as follows after its amendment in 1976:
"28. Appeal from decrees and orders:- (1) All decrees made by the Court in any proceeding under this Act shall, subject to the provisions of Sub-section (3), be appealable as decrees of the Court made in the exercise of its original civil jurisdiction, and every such appeal shall lie to the Court to which appeals ordinarily lie from the decisions of the Court given in the exercise of its original civil jurisdiction. (2) Orders made by the Court in any proceeding under this Act, under Section 25 or Section 26 shall, subject to the provisions of Sub-section (3), be appealabl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.