SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(All) 110

K.C.AGRAWAL
RAM NARAIN PATHAK – Appellant
Versus
URMILA DEVI – Respondent


K. C. AGRAWAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, against an order of the judge, Small Cause Court allowing an application of the respondent moved under Section 24 of the said Act granting Rs. 200/- per month as maintenance allowance and Rs. 500/- towards the litigation expenses.

( 2 ) IN a suit brought by the appellant under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act for divorce against the respondent, the latter moved an application for grant of pendente lite maintenance and litigation expenses. She claimed that she was unable to maintain herself and two daughters and two sons born to her from the appellant with the income of Rs. 150/- which she was getting from a ration shop. She alleged that she required Rs. 1,000/- per month towards the expenses of the family and, as such, the said amount be awarded to her as maintenance.

( 3 ) THE application was contested by the appellant. He asserted that as the respondent had independent income, she had no right to claim maintenance,

( 4 ) BEFORE the Judge, Small Causes, the parties filed affidavits in support of their respective cases. The learned Judge, Small Causes held that the monthly income of the r

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top