SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(All) 267

S.D.AGARWALA
STATE OF U. P. – Appellant
Versus
SINGHAL AND CO. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Radha Krishna, S.N.UPADHAYA

S. D. AGARWALA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a second appeal filed by the State of U. P. arising out of a suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent M/s. Singhal and Company for recovery of Rs. 4757. 45p.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY, the facts are that the plaintiff-respondent entered into a contract with the State of U. P. through the Executive Engineer P. W. D. Temporary Division, Allahabad for supply and fixing steel windows and north light windows as provided under the contract. There was certain delay in executing the contract. The case of the plaintiff-respondent was that the delay was caused not due to the fault of the plaintiff-respondent but because of the appellant State of U. P. The State of u. P. did not pay the full price of the contract, also deducted the security from the plaintiff-respondent and levied penalty on the plaintiff-respondent. The plaintiff-respondent, therefore, filed a suit for recovery of the amount of the price, deduction of security, refund of penalty and interest thereon. The appellants contested the suit on the ground that the plaintiff-respondent did not complete the work within time and as such the action of the appellants was justified and the plaintiff-respondent was not e























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top