SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(All) 150

H.N.SETH
GIRJA SHANKER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
RAM SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Namwar Singh, SIDHESHWARI PRASAD

H. N. SETH, J.

( 1 ) BY this application in revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure the defendants claim that the order dated 30-11-1979, passed by the Munsif, Jaunpur refusing to declare that the suit giving rise to this revision has abated, be set aside.

( 2 ) BABU Nandan Singh filed a suit against Udit Singh, Girja Shunker Singh, Ganga Pd. Singh, sankatha Singh and Ravindra Prasad Singh for a mandatory injunction directing them to demolish a wall marked by letters Ta-tha, and ta-ja shown in the plaint map.

( 3 ) DURING the pendency of the suit, defendant Udit Singh died in the year 1970, The heirs of the plaintiff Babu Nandan Singh, who too had died during the pendency of the suit, made an application, No. 103 Ka, in the year, 1977 stating that Udit Singh was dead and that his heirs and legal representatives were already on the record and prayed that a note be made accordingly. The defendants claim that Udit Singh had, apart from his sons who are defendants Nos. 3 to 5 left his widow and daughters also as his legal representatives. As the plaintiffs did not take steps to bring their names on record, the suit had abated and prayed that necessary declaration to t












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top