A.BANERJI
S. P. SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
PREM LATA SRIVASTAVA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS civil revision has been filed by the plaintiff, hereinafter referred to as the husband. He had filed a suit for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, hereinafter referred to as the Act. The suit was decreed ex parte on the 2nd June, 1973. On the 15th April, 1976 Smt. Prem lata Srivastava, hereinafter refrred to as the wife, made an application under Order 9, Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure for setting aside the ex parte decree claiming that she came to Know only on the 15th April, 1976 about the ex parte decree. She also moved an application for temporary injunction on the 15th April, 1976 restraining the husband from marrying again. This injunction order was served on the 16th April, 1976. The husband had contracted a second marriage with one Pratima Devi on the 14th April, 1976. The trial court by its order dated 22nd december, 1977 set aside the ex parte decree. The husband has come up in revision against the above order.
( 2 ) IN her application for setting aside the ex parte decree, the wife alleged that on the 13th April, 1976 she came to know that the husband was making preparation for his marriage at some other place. She then
Raghubir Sahai Bhatnagar v. Bhakt Sajjan
Cora Lillian Mc Pherson v. Oran Leo Me Pherson
Smt. Lila Gupta v. Laxmi Narain
Harish Chandra Raj Singh v. Deputy Land Acquisition Officer
State of Punjab v. Mst. Qaisar Jehan Begum
Nathu Ram v. Salim Abdul Karim
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.