SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(All) 541

SATISH CHANDRA, A. N. VERMA
RANG NATH – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT JUDGE, VARANASI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.S.BHATNAGAR

SATISH CHANDRA, C. J.


( 1 ) A learned single Judge has referred the follow ing question of law for decision by a larger bench:

"whether in a case where the lessor is a private person and the lessee is Government the suit can be filed before the Court of Small Causes in view of Entries (1) and (4) of Second Schedule of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act?"

( 2 ) THE petitioner is the landlord of a premises which was under the tenancy of the State government. The petitioner terminated the tenancy and after giving the usual notice under section 80, C. P. C. filed the present suit for the ejectment of the Government department which was in occupation of the accommodation. The suit was filed in the Small Cause Court. The suit was contested but was decreed by the trial court. The defendant went up in revision. The learned district Judge held that the suit was not cognizable by the Small Cause Court. He, instead of returning the plaint for presentation to the proper court, dismissed it. Hence the present writ petition at the instance of the landlord.

( 3 ) THE learned District Judge held that the Small Cause Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the suit on the basis of a single Judge d
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top