SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(All) 500

MURLIDHAR
KALIKA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


MURLIDHAR, J.

( 1 ) THESE two revisions arise out of the conviction of the four accused under Sections 323/34, i. P. C. by the appellate Court below and the sentence of Rs. 400/- each in default three months rigorous imprisonment out of which Rs. 500/- has been ordered to be paid as compensation to the complainant Sri Krishna Misra. Criminal Revision No. 1565 of 1980, has been filed by the accused and was pressed only on the question of sentence while Criminal Revision No. 1676 of 1980 has been filed by the complainant against the acquittal of the accused persons under sections 325/34, I. P. C.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the findings of the lower appellate Court the accused persons had beaten the victim; Kalika Singh by a lathi and the other three accused by fists. The lower appellate Court also found that the victim suffered no less than 15 injuries, 5 contusions, 5 abrasions, 2 traumatic swellings, 2 complaints of pain and one lacerated wound on the left thumb. The left thumb had also a fracture of the phalanx. These details are found in the trial Courts judgment also. The learned Counsel for the complainant also showed to me a copy of the injury report which discloses limbwise the distr









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top