SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(All) 443

H.N.SETH, R.M.SAHAI
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
UTTAR PRADESH STATE AGRO INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.SARUP, R.K.GULATI, V.Sarup

H. N. SETH, J.

( 1 ) AT the instance of the revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, has, in respect of assessment of the assessee, U. P. State Agro Industrial Corporation Ltd. , Lucknow, for the assessment year 1972-73, stated the case and referred the following question for the opinion of this court:

"whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee was entitled to depreciation on building which it purchased from the Government of Uttar Pradesh ?"

( 2 ) THE assessee, U. P. Agro Industrial Corporation Ltd. , Lucknow (hereinafter referred to as "the agro Corporation") was set up in the month of March, 1947, as a body registered under the indian Companies Act. Capital of the Agro Corporation was subscribed equally by the Govt. of india and the Govt. of Uttar Pradesh. The State Govt. vide its order No. 1748/xii-J-246/67, dated April 27, 1968, transferred possession over the Agricultural Workshop, Lucknow, and pilot Project, Karimganj to the Agro Corporation in consideration of Rs. 44,07,589 (Rs. 40,00,000 worth of equity shares and Rs. 4,07,589 paid in cash ). During the assessment proceedings, the Agro Corporation, inter alia, claimed allowance by































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top