SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(All) 435

K.C.AGRAWAL
TEJDHARI – Appellant
Versus
BAUL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Namwar Singh

K. C. AGRAWAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been filed against a judgment of the First Additional District Judge, Varanasi, dated 1st Mar. , 1973, declaring the claimants Second Set, i. e. 2 to 5, namely Ram Palat Singh, ram Murti Singh, Ram Dhani Singh, and Gulab Singh, to be entitled to receive the amount of compensation awarded, Rs. 784. 68 paise in question.

( 2 ) THE facts, briefly stated, are these. Certain land of Khata No. 9 was acquired by the Land acquisition Officer, Varanasi, for Moghlabir Tubewell Channel in village Attarsuiya. Pargana qasba Raja, Tehsil and district Varanasi. The compensation awarded was prepared in the name of Baul Singh son of Nandan Singh, on the basis of Khasras and Khataunis. Subsequently, rampalat Singh and others, who were claimant Second Set, appeared and made an application before the Special Land Acquisition Officer that they had purchased the acquired land in question, and, as such, were entitled to receive the compensation. Baul Singh was the claimant first Set. These two sets were heard. But, since they did not agree to the apportionment of the amount of compensation, or as to the person to whom the same was payable, the Collector made a refe
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top