SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(All) 428

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
H. N. Seth and M. P. Mehrotra, JJ.
UTTAR PRADESH HOTEL AND RESTAURANTS LTD. - Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX - Respondents
Income-tax Reference 358 Of 1977
Decided On : 10/28/1980

Advocates Appeared:
R.K.GULATI, V.K.Rastogi

THE CONDITIONS FOR RELIEF UNDER SECTION 80J OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961, IN RESPECT OF NEWLY ESTABLISHED HOTEL BUSINESSES, INCLUDING THE REQUIREMENT OF A MINIMUM NUMBER OF GUEST ROOMS AND AMENITIES, MUST BE STRICTLY COMPLIED WITH.

Headnote:

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 - SECTION 80J - NEWLY ESTABLISHED HOTEL BUSINESS - CONDITIONS FOR RELIEF - NUMBER OF GUEST ROOMS AND AMENITIES - INTERPRETATION OF RULE 18 - HELD, THE ASSESSEE IS NOT ENTITLED TO RELIEF UNDER SECTION 80J IN RESPECT OF THE NEW WING ADDED TO THE HOTEL AS IT DID NOT SATISFY THE CONDITION OF HAVING AT LEAST FIFTY GUEST ROOMS WITH ATTACHED BATHROOMS AND OTHER AMENITIES AS REQUIRED BY RULE 18.

Fact of the Case:

THE ASSESSEE, A LIMITED COMPANY, DERIVED INCOME FROM A FIVE STAR HOTEL KNOWN AS HOTEL CLARKS SHIRAJ AT AGRA. DURING THE YEARS 1969 AND 1970, IT ADDED A NEW WING TO THE HOTEL EMPLOYING A CAPITAL OF RS. 16,35,088. IN THE RELEVANT ASSESSMENT YEAR, THE ASSESSEE CLAIMED BENEFIT UNDER SECTION 80J IN RESPECT OF THE CAPITAL EMPLOYED BY IT IN THE NEW WING. THE ITO DISALLOWED THE RELIEF ON THE GROUND THAT THE BUSINESS IN RESPECT OF THE NEW WING HAD NOT BEEN RECOGNISED BY THE CENTRAL GOVT. THE AAC AND THE TRIBUNAL UPHELD THE DISALLOWANCE.

Finding of the Court:

THE COURT HELD THAT THE ASSESSEE WAS NOT ENTITLED TO RELIEF UNDER SECTION 80J IN RESPECT OF THE NEW WING ADDED TO THE HOTEL AS IT DID NOT SATISFY THE CONDITION OF HAVING AT LEAST FIFTY GUEST ROOMS WITH ATTACHED BATHROOMS AND OTHER AMENITIES AS REQUIRED BY RULE 18.

Issues: 1. WHETHER, ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, THE ASSESSEE WAS ENTITLED TO RELIEF UNDER SECTION 80J OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961, IN RESPECT OF THE NEW WING ADDED IN THE HOTEL ? 2. WHETHER, ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, AN APPEAL IS MAINTAINABLE AGAINST AN ORDER DIRECTING THE LEVY OF INTEREST UNDER SECTION 215 OF THE ACT ?

Ratio Decidendi: THE COURT INTERPRETED SECTION 80J(6)(C) AND RULE 18 OF THE INCOME-TAX RULES TO HOLD THAT A HOTEL LOCATED IN A CITY WITH A POPULATION OF MORE THAN FIVE LAKHS, LIKE AGRA, MUST HAVE AT LEAST FIFTY GUEST ROOMS WITH ATTACHED BATHROOMS AND OTHER AMENITIES TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR RELIEF UNDER SECTION 80J. THE COURT ALSO HELD THAT THE ASSESSEE COULD NOT COMBINE THE ROOMS IN THE NEW WING WITH THOSE IN THE EXISTING HOTEL TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.

Final Decision: BOTH THE QUESTIONS REFERRED TO THE COURT WERE ANSWERED IN THE NEGATIVE AND IN FAVOUR OF THE REVENUE.

H. N. SETH, J.

( 1 ) AT the instance of the assessee, M/s. U. P. Hotel and Restaurants Ltd. , Varanasi, the Income-tax appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, has, for the assessment year 1972-73, the previous year for which ended on 30th September, 1971, stated the case and referred the following two questions for the opinion of this court :

"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee was entitled to relief under Section 80j of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of the new wing added in the hotel ? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, an appeal is maintainable against an order directing the levy of interest under Section 215 of the Act ?"

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the facts giving rise to the first question are that the assessee is a limited company which derives income from a five star hotel known as Hotel Clarks Shiraj at Agra. The assessee commenced the aforesaid hotel business at Agra some time after the year 1961. During the years 1969 and 1970 it added a new wing to the Hotel Clarks Shiraj employing a capital of rs. 16,35,088. In the relevant assessment year, the assessee claimed benefit under Section 80j in respect of the capital employed by it in the new wing. The ITO disallowed the relief under section 80j claimed by the assessee on the ground that the business in respect of the new wing had not been recognised by the Central Govt. In appeal, the AAC observed that as the population of Agra exceeded five lakhs, the benefit of Section 80j could be given to the assessee only if the new wing added by it to Hotel Clarks Shiraj had fifty separate guest rooms with attached bathrooms equipped with sanitary fittings, etc. Since the wing had only forty rooms, the assessee was not entitled to any relief in respect thereof under Section 80j of the Act.

( 3 ) THE assessee then went up in appeal before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, which following its own decision for the earlier years, affirmed the disallowance of the relief claimed by the assessee.

( 4 ) RELEVANT portion of Section 80j, as it stood at the material, time ran thus :

"80j. Deduction in respect of profits and gains from newly established industrial undertakings or ships or hotel business in certain cases.-- (1) Where the gross total income of an assessee includes any profits and grains derived from. . . . . . business of a hotel, to which this section applies, there shall, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this section, be allowed, in computing the total income of the assessee, a deduction from such profits and gains. . . . . . (6) This section applies to the business of any hotel, where all the following conditions are fulfilled, namely :- (a) the business of the hotel starts functioning on or after the 1st day of April, 1961, and is not formed by the splitting up or the reconstruction, of a business already in existence or by the transfer to a new business of a building previously used as a hotel or of any machinery or plant previously used for any purpose ; (b) the business of the hotel is owned and carried on by a company registered in India with a paid-up capital of not less than five hundred thousand rupees; (c) the hotel has such number and types of guest rooms and provides such amenities as may be prescribed, having regard to the population and the tourist importance of the place in which the hotel is located ; and (d) the hotel is for the time being approved for the purposes of this sub-section by the Central government. . . . . . "

"rule 18 of the Income-tax Rules laid down that for the purpose of Clause (c) of Sub-section (6)of Section 80j, a hotel should have- (a) not less then fifty guest rooms, with attached bathrooms, equipped with modern sanitary fittings if it is situated in a town with a population of five lakhs or more ; or (b) not less than twenty-five guest rooms, with attached bathrooms, equipped with modern sanitary fittings, if it is situated in a town with a popul










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top