SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(All) 697

K.M.DAYAL
KESHEO SARAN – Appellant
Versus
JAGDISH SARAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.P.Gupta, V.K.Tandon

K. M. DAYAL, J.

( 1 ) THE present second appeal has been filed by the judgment debtor against the order of the court below for execution of the decree. The decree holder respondent, predecessor-in-interest Lala faquir Chand filed Suit No. 234 of 1959, against the appellant for mandatory injunction to restore a portion of the stair case and roof which had fallen down or were pulled down by the defendant.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff claimed that he was the owner of the Sahdari on the first floor of the accommodation as well as a portion of ground floor. The approach to that Sahdari from the ground floor was through a staircase which was in the ground floor portion of the defendant and on roof of the defendant. He claimed that he was the dominant owner and the defendant was a servient owner and he had a right to enjoy the easement without any interruption. He claimed that the defendant demolished his house and thus the roof and the upper portion of the staircase which was owned by the defendant also fell down and the plaintiff had no other approach to his portion.

( 3 ) THE suit was decreed by the trial court. The appeal was allowed and the suit was dismissed by the lower appellate court. The







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top