SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(All) 605

K.N.SETH, K.C.AGRAWAL, A.N.VERMA
BHAIRON PRASAD CHAURASIYA – Appellant
Versus
TARA DEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.S.SINHA, R.P.Tripathi, Ravi Kant

A. N. VARMA, J.

( 1 ) THE question which falls for determination in this appeal is whether it is legally permissible to attach and sell an agreement to purchase an immovable property in execution of a decree A division Bench of this Court had occasion to consider this precise question in the case of Prem narain Kapoor v. Sudh-risht Narain Anad reported in 1970 All LJ 721. The Division Bench considered the question in depth and answered it in the affirmative. However, when this execution appeal came up for hearing before a learned single Judge, he felt that the above decision needed reconsideration in view of certain observations made by the Supreme Court in the case of Swami Motor Transports (P.) Ltd. v. Sri Sankara-swamigal Mutt reported in AIR 1963 SC 864. In the opinion of the learned single Judge, the observations made by the Supreme court in the above case rendered the decision of this Court in the case of Prem Narain Kapoor v. S. N. Anad (supra) of doubtful validity. On a reference made by the learned single Judge, the case had been placed before us.

( 2 ) WE may now briefly set out the facts which are relevant for the determination of the controversy.

( 3 ) THE appellant hel







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top