SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(All) 218

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
N. D. Ojha and P. N. Bakshi, JJ.
MEHROTRA ENTERPRISES - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P - Respondents
. . Of .
Decided On : 08/25/1977

The expression "similar kind of work" in Rule 25 (2) (v) (a) of the U. P. Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Rules, 1975, means work which is very much alike or akin in substance or structure, even if there are some dissimilarities.

Headnote:

CONTRACT LABOUR - SIMILAR KIND OF WORK - RULE 25 (2) (V) (A) OF U. P. CONTRACT LABOUR (REGULATION AND ABOLITION) RULES, 1975 - INTERPRETATION - COMPANY LOADERS AND CONTRACTORS LABOUR PERFORMING SIMILAR KIND OF WORK - ENTITLED TO SAME WAGES AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE.

Fact of the Case:

Indian Explosives Ltd. engaged permanent labour force known as "loaders" for loading urea bags from conveyor belts to railway wagons. The company also engaged a contractor, Mehrotra Enterprises, to unload the bags from trucks and load them into railway wagons or trucks for onward destination. The Labour Commissioner, U. P., held that the labour employed by the company and the contractor were engaged in similar kind of work and were entitled to the same wages and conditions of service under Rule 25 (2) (v) (a) of the U. P. Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Rules, 1975.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the work performed by the company loaders at the conveyor belt in loading urea bags in the railway wagon or truck was similar to the work performed by the contractors labour in unloading the same of urea from the truck to the godown and loading them again in the truck or the railway wagon. The court found that the manual effort put in by the companys labour was more strenuous, though the work was similar in nature.

Issues: Whether the work performed by the company loaders and the contractors labour was the same or similar kind of work.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the expression "similar kind of work" in Rule 25 (2) (v) (a) of the U. P. Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Rules, 1975, and held that it meant work which was very much alike or akin in substance or structure, even if there were some dissimilarities. The court found that the work performed by the company loaders and the contractors labour, though not identical, was similar in nature, as both involved manual effort in loading and unloading urea bags.

Final Decision: The court dismissed both the writ petitions filed by the company and the contractor, upholding the Labour Commissioner's award that the contractors labour were entitled to the same wages and conditions of service as the company loaders under Rule 25 (2) (v) (a) of the U. P. Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Rules, 1975.


P. N. BAKSHI, J.

( 1 ) MESSRS. Indian Explosives Ltd. , Fertilizer Division deals in the manufacture and sale of the Chemical Fertilizer popularly known as urea. Its factory is situate at Panki, about 13 Kms. from Kanpur. Urea is manufactured in the factory and is packed in polythenelined gunny bags in the factory premises by mechanised operations. Thereafter these bags of urea, each weighing 50kgs. are diverted by mechanised conveyor belts to the railway siding. The company aforesaid engages a permanent labour force for loading these packed urea bags from conveyor belt to the railway wagons. According to the case of the company, this permanent labour force known as "loaders" are engaged in specialised operation of unloading these urea bags from the conveyor belts to the wagons. Each loader handles one bag at a time. The conveyor belt being at a height of 5. the bag is taken on the shoulder by the loader and it is stock piled in the wagon. A group of four loaders work continuously at a time on one conveyor belt. The time interval between the coming of successive bag is 3 seconds. Thus 20 bags are loaded In a minute by the group of four of the companys loaders. Since the capacity of the railway wagon is normaly 24 Tons, it takes about 24 minutes to complete the loading of one wagon with urea bags of 50kg. weight each. After completing the loading of one wagon, the four loaders take rest and are replaced by another batch of four loaders. In case wagons are not available the companys loaders load these bags in trucks. The loaded truck is then sent either directly to the destination outside the factory from the packing plant or in the alternative to the Non Duty Paid Shed (N. D. P. S.) where these bags are again unloaded by the labour employed by the contractor Messrs. Mehrotra Enterprises. One truck is unloaded by a group of 16 labourers. The bags are unloaded by the contractors labour either on their back or on their head to be stock piled in the godown. There. after on the availability of wagons or trucks, the contractors labour again load them therein for onward destination.

( 2 ) THE Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition Act, 1970 (Act No. 37 of 1970) was passed by Parliament and received the assent of the president on 5th September, 1970. Under Section 35 of the said Act the State of Uttar Pradesh hag framed "the Uttar Pradesh Contract labour Regulation and Abolition) Rules, 1975" On 10th March, 197? the Fertilizer Workers Union filed an application before the Labour commissioner, U. P. alleging that the workeas employed by the contractor Messrs. Mehrotra Enterprises should be paid the same wages as are paid to the workmen of the Indian Explosives Ltd. under the provisions of Rule 25 (2) (v) of the aforesaid Rules. Notice was issued on this application on 24th March, 1977. The Fertilizer Workers union filed their written statement on 4th April, 1977. Thereafter the indian Explosives Ltd. as well as Messrs. Mehrotra Enterprises filed their written statement on 12th April, 1977. It appeals that as per directions of the Labour Commissioner Sri P. S. Misra, Conciliation officer, Kanpur Region, Kanpur made a spot inspection and submitted his report to the Labour Commissioner. The record of the case was summoned by us and we have perused this report Thereafter on 28th april, 1977 the Labour Commissioner, U. P. gave an award by which he held that the labour employed by the company and that employed by the con-tractor ware engaged in similar kind of work and as such they were entitled to the benefit of Rule 25 (2) (v) of the U. P. Contract labour (Regulation and Abolition Rules, 1975. Aggrieved there by Writ petition No. 1606 of 1977 has been filed by Mehrotra Enterprises (hereinafter called the contractor) and Writ Petition No. 1607 of 1977 has been filed by the Indian Explosives Ltd, (hereinafter called the company ). Both these writ petitions are being disposed of together by this common judgment.

( 3 ) WE have heard learned























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top