SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(All) 22

N.U.BEG
VIDYA SAGAR – Appellant
Versus
BOARD OF REVENUE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.D.Srivastava, Uma Shanker Srivastava, UMESH CHANDRA

N. U. BEG, J.

( 1 ) THE Petitioner in this Writ Petition Vidya Sagar was confirmed on the post of Supervisor kanungo from the 1st of April, 1952. On the 24th of October, 1958, he was appointed as an officiating Naib Tahsildar. On the 12th of December, 1962, the Board of Revenue which is the opposite party in this writ petition issused a list of 81 officiating Naib Tahsildars who were reverted to their substantive post of Supervisor Kanungos, and, in their place, appointed 82 supervisor Kaungos who were declared eligible for appointment as officiating Naib Tahsildars. The petitioner was one of the persons who was reverted to the substantive post of Supervisor kanumgo, and was not put in the list of those Supervisor Kanungos who were declared eligible for appointment as officiating Naib Tahsidars. A copy of the said order is Annexure 1. On the 13th of December, 1962, the opposite party Issued another order giving a list of 54 supervisor Kanungos who were declared as permanent Naib Tahsildars. The petitioners name was absent from this list also. A copy of this order is filed as Annexure 2 to the writ petition. Thereafter the petitioner filed the present writ petition for the Issue of












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top