IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
V. Bhargava, D. S. Mathur, G. Kumar, S. D. Khare and G. C. Mathur, JJ.
BOARD OF REVENUE - Appellant
Versus
SRIDHAR ADVOCATE - Respondents
Misc. Reference 389 Of 1962
Decided On : 01/13/1964
STAMP ACT - SETTLEMENT - DEFINITION - INSTRUMENT EXECUTED FOR THE BENEFIT OF DONOR'S CHILDREN - HELD TO BE A SETTLEMENT - STAMP DUTY CHARGEABLE UNDER ARTICLE 58 OF SCHEDULE I-B OF THE ACT.
Fact of the Case:
The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority referred a question to the court to determine whether a draft deed was a declaration of trust chargeable under Article 64, Schedule I-B of the Stamp Act, a settlement chargeable under Article 58, Schedule I-B of the Act, or if it fell under any other category for charging stamp duty.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the instrument was a settlement within the meaning of Section 2(24) of the Stamp Act and was liable to stamp duty as an instrument of settlement under Article 58 of Schedule I-B of the Act.
Issues: 1. Whether the draft deed was a declaration of trust chargeable under Article 64, Schedule I-B of the Stamp Act? 2. Whether it was a settlement as defined in Section 2(24)(b) of the Act, chargeable under Article 58, Schedule I-B of the Act? 3. If it was neither, under what other category did it fall under the Stamp Act for purposes of charging stamp duty?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court interpreted the definition of "settlement" in Section 2(24) of the Stamp Act and held that an instrument could be both a deed of trust and a settlement if it satisfied the conditions laid down in the definition. 2. The court found that the instrument in question was a disposition of the future rental income from two houses for the purpose of distributing that property among the members of the donor's family, and was thus a settlement under the first part of Sub-clause (b) of Section 2(24). 3. The court also held that the instrument was a settlement under the second part of Sub-clause (b) of Section 2(24) as it was a disposition of the property for the purpose of providing for the donor's minor children who were dependent on him.
Final Decision: The court opined that the instrument was liable to stamp duty as an instrument of settlement under Article 58 of Schedule I-B of the Stamp Act.
( 1 ) THIS Reference has been made by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority under Section 57 of the Indian Stamp Act in respect of a document because that Authority felt a doubt as to whether the stamp duty on the instrument was chargeable as a settlement or as a trust. The following three questions have been drafted by the Authority on which our opinion has been sought: (1) Whether the draft deed under reference is a "declaration of Trust" chargeable under Article 64, Schedule I-B of the Stamp Act; or (2) whether it is a "settlement" as defined in Section 2 (24) (b) of the Act, chargeable under article 58, Schedule I-B of the Act, or (3) if it is neither, under what other category does it fall under the Stamp Act for purposes of charging stamp duty.
( 2 ) WE may at the outset mention that it appears to us that in framing the questions for our opinion the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority appears to have proceeded on the incorrect basis that the instrument under the Stamp Act can be either a deed of trust or a deed of settlement only and not both. The word "settlement" is defined in Section 2 (24) of the Act as follows: " settlement means any non-testamentary disposition, in writing, of movable or immovable property made: (a) in consideration of marriage, (b) for the purpose of distributing property of the settlor among his family or those for whom he desires to provide, or for the purpose of providing for some person dependent on him, or (c) for any religious or charitable purpose; and includes an agreement in writing to make such a disposition and, where any such disposition had not been made in writing, any instrument recording, whether by way of declaration of trust or otherwise, the terms of any such disposition. " This definition of the word "settlement" itself makes it clear that even instruments which are executed containing a declaration of trust can be settlements provided the conditions laid down earlier in that definition are satisfied. The question in these circumstances that falls for our opinion is whether this particular instrument, to which this Reference relates, is a "settlement" or not, even though it may, on the face of it, be a deed of Trust. Under Section 6 of the Stamp Act, if a deed of Trust also amounts to a Settlement, the stamp duty will be chargeable on it as an instrument of Settlement under Article 58 of the Schedule I-B of the Act, and not as an instrument of Trust under Article 64 of Schedule I-B of the Act.
( 3 ) WE have heard learned counsel for the parties, and we have come to the conclusion that this instrument, to which this Reference relates, must be held to be a deed of Settlement within the meaning of that word as defined above.
( 4 ) THE instrument relates to two houses situated in the city of Allahabad. In the instrument the executant has mentioned that he is executing it for the benefit of his three daughters as well as his two sons and other children. The object of executing the instrument is indicated as being the desire of settling on trust the income of the two houses for the purpose of carrying out the wishes of the donor as described, In the main body if the instrument, the donor granted to the trustee for a period of twenty years the two properties mentioned above for him to have and hold the same in trust for the objects of the Trust. The donor specifically relinquished for the time being all claims to any interest in these properties. It was recited that the children of the donor were all minors and the donor was desirous that his children should have some financial security by the time each of them attained majority. The main provisions contained in the instrument were that from the income of the property the taxes payable to the Municipal Corporation had to be met so as not to exceed onefourth of the rental income and the trustee was to set apart another one-fourth" of the rental income for the purpose of reconstructing one of the houses which WAS in a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.