SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(All) 78

B.DAYAL, R.S.PATHAK
HAR SARUP – Appellant
Versus
BRIJ BHUSHAN SARAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.B.SARAN, A.N.BHARGAVA, G.P.BHARGAVA, P.J.AHULIWALA, S.C.KHARE

PATHAK, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal under the Representation of the People Act against an order of the Election tribunal Bijnor dismissing an election petition.

( 2 ) OF a number of candidates for election to the U. P. Legislative Assembly from the Dehra Dun city constituency, the first respondent Brij Bhushan Sharma was declared elected. His election was challenged by an election petition filed by the present appellants, and among the several allegations contained in that petition it was alleged in paragraph 4 (F) : "because respondent No. 1 through his agent and worker Shri Katuri Vaid, who is also president of City Congress Committee with the consent and connivance of respondent No. 1 threatened on the 15th February, 1962, at Dharampur, Dehra Dun, one Sri Jai Lal Khandelwal, an elector that his bones would be broken if he did not cast his vote for respondent No. 1 and also did not work for him and persuade others to vote for him. "

( 3 ) A number of persons were impleaded as respondents to the election petition but Raturi Vaid was not impleaded. The first respondent raised an objection in his written statement that the election petition was liable to be dismissed on account of the








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top